ESP8266 Developer Zone The Official ESP8266 Forum 2015-07-08T10:29:57+08:00 https://bbs.espressif.com:443/feed.php?f=7&t=685 2015-07-08T10:29:57+08:00 2015-07-08T10:29:57+08:00 https://bbs.espressif.com:443/viewtopic.php?t=685&p=2562#p2562 <![CDATA[Re: Should data type UartBautRate not be UartBaudRate?]]>
So sorry for our poor English.. :oops:

Dear tve, if you have any advice about API Doc please feel free to let us know, you could send email to support-at@espressif.com, sorry for the inconvenience.

Statistics: Posted by ESP_Faye — Wed Jul 08, 2015 10:29 am


]]>
2015-07-07T17:44:29+08:00 2015-07-07T17:44:29+08:00 https://bbs.espressif.com:443/viewtopic.php?t=685&p=2549#p2549 <![CDATA[Re: Should data type UartBautRate not be UartBaudRate?]]>
kolban wrote:
Howdy ... its one thing having typos in the docs. They can easily be fixed.... however, this post was about what appears to be a typo being present in the actual SDK code that is meant to be consumed by users.

For example, as of right now, if I want to create a variable that can be passed into "uart_init", I have to code:

Code:

UartBautRate myVariable;


So ... if this is really an accidental typo, then we can't simply change the value without potentially breaking existing code that may use this data type name. If it is a typo, then my vote would be to change the data type name and inform folks that they may have to code change before deploying apps.

Now ... being a dumb mono-language speaker, I look at Chinese writing and wouldn't even begin to know where to start to say something was spelled incorrectly. In fact, I'm so ignorant that I can't even tell you if it is possible to make spelling mistakes with logograms. I can easily see how a translation of the pronounced word "baud" (b -od) becomes "baut" (b -ot).



Oops...
:o :o :o :o :o :o

Statistics: Posted by costaud — Tue Jul 07, 2015 5:44 pm


]]>
2015-07-07T06:17:55+08:00 2015-07-07T06:17:55+08:00 https://bbs.espressif.com:443/viewtopic.php?t=685&p=2530#p2530 <![CDATA[Re: Should data type UartBautRate not be UartBaudRate?]]>
For example, as of right now, if I want to create a variable that can be passed into "uart_init", I have to code:

Code:

UartBautRate myVariable;


So ... if this is really an accidental typo, then we can't simply change the value without potentially breaking existing code that may use this data type name. If it is a typo, then my vote would be to change the data type name and inform folks that they may have to code change before deploying apps.

Now ... being a dumb mono-language speaker, I look at Chinese writing and wouldn't even begin to know where to start to say something was spelled incorrectly. In fact, I'm so ignorant that I can't even tell you if it is possible to make spelling mistakes with logograms. I can easily see how a translation of the pronounced word "baud" (b -od) becomes "baut" (b -ot).

Statistics: Posted by kolban — Tue Jul 07, 2015 6:17 am


]]>
2015-07-07T05:51:47+08:00 2015-07-07T05:51:47+08:00 https://bbs.espressif.com:443/viewtopic.php?t=685&p=2526#p2526 <![CDATA[Re: Should data type UartBautRate not be UartBaudRate?]]> It would be awesome if Espressif could publish the API docs in a wiki, then we (the community) could fix the typos and miswordings, and perhaps correctly explain what the functions do...

Statistics: Posted by tve — Tue Jul 07, 2015 5:51 am


]]>
2015-07-05T01:42:16+08:00 2015-07-05T01:42:16+08:00 https://bbs.espressif.com:443/viewtopic.php?t=685&p=2493#p2493 <![CDATA[Should data type UartBautRate not be UartBaudRate?]]> Statistics: Posted by kolban — Sun Jul 05, 2015 1:42 am


]]>